fe risk,Risk of death
Is life riskier today than in Grandma's day
in other words is risk of death today is more than it was in grandma's day?
Most people seem to believe that life is becoming riskier, even though most objective measures show the contrary . Cancer rates, except for lung cancer, have decreased or remain stable, lung's cancer's increase is attributed to increased smoking. Also, life expectancy continues to increase.
Real differences in life risk or risk of death may be less important than people's perception of what is riskier . One survey of these perceptions compared the amount of risk experienced in day-to-day living with that experienced 20 years before. Only 6% of 1,500 people said there was less life risk than there had been 20 years earlier, whereas 78% said there was currently more risk of death.
Of 401 top corporate executives, 36% said there was less risk, and 38% said more; 26% of the 47 members of Congress who responded said the risk was less, and 55% said more. While these data on risk do not make any specific reference to food, food certainly can be assumed to be one of the factors included in the public's perception of increased life risk.
It is easy to get caught up in the myth of the wholesome, risk-free way Grandma ate. The nostalgic vision of food in Grandma's day considers neither the effort required to preserve and prepare the food nor the limited quality, variety, and availability of food from the root cellar and the preserving pantry, especially in the late winter.
Grandma's diet risk
Was Grandma's diet actually as risk free as we tend to visualize it?
No, Grandma and her household suffered some very real risks, including botulism from improperly canned vegetables. Even properly canned food had the problem of low nutrient content, since foods were boiled for 6 hours in a conserver. Root-cellared vegetables in the late winter also suffered significant nutrient losses.
Lack of variety and availability plagued the meal planners of Grandma's day. Few choices often translated into limited availability of nutrients, especially vitamins provided by fresh fruits and vegetables.
Scurvy was a real risk, as vegetables canned in a conserver or held in a root-cellar lost considerable Vitamin C- this is why old cookbooks contained recipes for spring tonics. In addition to the loss of nutrients, the vegetables could be withered and moldy. The mold could possibly contain aflatoxin. Just because Grandma had never heard of it and didn't worry about it didn't mean that it wasn't there!
Grains in Grandma's day may have been free of pesticides, but crop losses at times were catastrophic. Histories of American settlers on the Great Plains recount crop failures due to plagues of locusts and other pests. Nor were crop failures the only food loss, when losses of stored grain to rodents, insects, birds, and molds are considered.
The child's story The house that Jack Built shows the inevitability or rodents where there is flour. Accounts in literature such as in The Mayor of Casterbridge by Thomas Hardy allude to problems with moldy grains in bread. Food quality, as well as food availability, was affected.
So much for the good old days!
Perception of life risk have changed. We have long forgotten the risks of Grandma's larder and instead have romanticized life in those times. In place of these old death risks, we have found new risks in substances occurring in parts per million as opposed to locusts swarms of millions.
Increased media attention has heightened our awareness of risks that were not only unknown to Grandma but frequently unknown even last year. Some of these risks include the fear of radioactivity caused by the Chernobyl nuclear incident in the Soviet Union in 1986 and the fears of contamination by EDB in 1984 and of Alar in 1986 in the United States.
Risks in developing and in Third World countries
The media attention may also make some believe that it is riskier to live in highly industrialized societies (with risks similar to those in the United States) than in more agrarian or developing societies. Predominant health risks in developing countries remain those associated with the prevalence of communicable disease, other natural hazards and the lack of a safe and nutritious food supply.
Crop losses to drought, pests, poor soil quality, and over-farming of marginal land are common in many developing countries.
Risks from inadequate sanitation and refrigeration and from unsafe water supplies are very real in Third World countries and are responsible for infection parasites, and high rates of infant morality.
Thus, life in both industrialized countries and developing countries is risky, (where we go then?live on the moon for example?)!, but the risks are clearly different. Before we rush headlong to reduce risks so that they are like those of another culture, we should contemplate the real nature and extend of both sets of risks.
Some suggest if Americans change their dietary habits to eat like Japanese, will this reduce or increase their risks?
Clearly the risk for certain cancers is much lower in the United States while the risk for other cancers is much higher.
Common risks in the United states
Cause of death (Risk of Death per 1,000,000 persons per year)
Travel,
40 walking,20,000 motorcycling,20-30 car, 20-30 airplane,9
Sports death risks
400 Canoeing,30 motor boating,170 skiing, 1,200 car racing.
Food risks
75 Wine, one bottle per day ,20 beer, one bottle per day,40 aflatoxin, 4tsp peanut butter per day ,0.4 charcoal broiled steak 1/2 lb per week.
Other
2,000-5,000 Smoking , 20 cigarettes per day ,70-90 falls, 0,05-0.1 lightning.
Conclusion
I'll talk later in another post about what is risk and what it has to do with food, hope you enjoyed my post about Is life riskier today than in Grandma's day? your feedback is welcome at any time because I need to know if you think that life is riskier today than in Grandma's day or not.
You can find more info about risk here http://foodrisk.org
Is life riskier today than in Grandma's day
in other words is risk of death today is more than it was in grandma's day?
Most people seem to believe that life is becoming riskier, even though most objective measures show the contrary . Cancer rates, except for lung cancer, have decreased or remain stable, lung's cancer's increase is attributed to increased smoking. Also, life expectancy continues to increase.
Real differences in life risk or risk of death may be less important than people's perception of what is riskier . One survey of these perceptions compared the amount of risk experienced in day-to-day living with that experienced 20 years before. Only 6% of 1,500 people said there was less life risk than there had been 20 years earlier, whereas 78% said there was currently more risk of death.
Of 401 top corporate executives, 36% said there was less risk, and 38% said more; 26% of the 47 members of Congress who responded said the risk was less, and 55% said more. While these data on risk do not make any specific reference to food, food certainly can be assumed to be one of the factors included in the public's perception of increased life risk.
It is easy to get caught up in the myth of the wholesome, risk-free way Grandma ate. The nostalgic vision of food in Grandma's day considers neither the effort required to preserve and prepare the food nor the limited quality, variety, and availability of food from the root cellar and the preserving pantry, especially in the late winter.
Grandma's diet risk
Was Grandma's diet actually as risk free as we tend to visualize it?
No, Grandma and her household suffered some very real risks, including botulism from improperly canned vegetables. Even properly canned food had the problem of low nutrient content, since foods were boiled for 6 hours in a conserver. Root-cellared vegetables in the late winter also suffered significant nutrient losses.
Lack of variety and availability plagued the meal planners of Grandma's day. Few choices often translated into limited availability of nutrients, especially vitamins provided by fresh fruits and vegetables.
Scurvy was a real risk, as vegetables canned in a conserver or held in a root-cellar lost considerable Vitamin C- this is why old cookbooks contained recipes for spring tonics. In addition to the loss of nutrients, the vegetables could be withered and moldy. The mold could possibly contain aflatoxin. Just because Grandma had never heard of it and didn't worry about it didn't mean that it wasn't there!
Grains in Grandma's day may have been free of pesticides, but crop losses at times were catastrophic. Histories of American settlers on the Great Plains recount crop failures due to plagues of locusts and other pests. Nor were crop failures the only food loss, when losses of stored grain to rodents, insects, birds, and molds are considered.
The child's story The house that Jack Built shows the inevitability or rodents where there is flour. Accounts in literature such as in The Mayor of Casterbridge by Thomas Hardy allude to problems with moldy grains in bread. Food quality, as well as food availability, was affected.
So much for the good old days!
Perception of life risk have changed. We have long forgotten the risks of Grandma's larder and instead have romanticized life in those times. In place of these old death risks, we have found new risks in substances occurring in parts per million as opposed to locusts swarms of millions.
Increased media attention has heightened our awareness of risks that were not only unknown to Grandma but frequently unknown even last year. Some of these risks include the fear of radioactivity caused by the Chernobyl nuclear incident in the Soviet Union in 1986 and the fears of contamination by EDB in 1984 and of Alar in 1986 in the United States.
Risks in developing and in Third World countries
The media attention may also make some believe that it is riskier to live in highly industrialized societies (with risks similar to those in the United States) than in more agrarian or developing societies. Predominant health risks in developing countries remain those associated with the prevalence of communicable disease, other natural hazards and the lack of a safe and nutritious food supply.
Crop losses to drought, pests, poor soil quality, and over-farming of marginal land are common in many developing countries.
Risks from inadequate sanitation and refrigeration and from unsafe water supplies are very real in Third World countries and are responsible for infection parasites, and high rates of infant morality.
Thus, life in both industrialized countries and developing countries is risky, (where we go then?live on the moon for example?)!, but the risks are clearly different. Before we rush headlong to reduce risks so that they are like those of another culture, we should contemplate the real nature and extend of both sets of risks.
Some suggest if Americans change their dietary habits to eat like Japanese, will this reduce or increase their risks?
Clearly the risk for certain cancers is much lower in the United States while the risk for other cancers is much higher.
Common risks in the United states
Cause of death (Risk of Death per 1,000,000 persons per year)
Travel,
40 walking,20,000 motorcycling,20-30 car, 20-30 airplane,9
Sports death risks
400 Canoeing,30 motor boating,170 skiing, 1,200 car racing.
Food risks
75 Wine, one bottle per day ,20 beer, one bottle per day,40 aflatoxin, 4tsp peanut butter per day ,0.4 charcoal broiled steak 1/2 lb per week.
Other
2,000-5,000 Smoking , 20 cigarettes per day ,70-90 falls, 0,05-0.1 lightning.
Conclusion
I'll talk later in another post about what is risk and what it has to do with food, hope you enjoyed my post about Is life riskier today than in Grandma's day? your feedback is welcome at any time because I need to know if you think that life is riskier today than in Grandma's day or not.
You can find more info about risk here http://foodrisk.org
مع تحيات وصفه وخلطة أعشاب
إقرإي أيضا مواضيع أخرى عن مسكات سهلة لجمالك
Put the internet to work for you.
ليست هناك تعليقات: